Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	70.4% Very good	Memory 84.3 1-Core 82.6 2-Core 155 64% 107 Pts	4-Core 306 8-Core 479 48% 393 Pts	64-Core 499 31% 499 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% MSI(1462 8094) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.07% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 2.54 Parallax 0.5 1% 1.41 fps	MRender 2.19 Gravity 0.87 Splatting 1.57 1% 1.54 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.07% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
SH00R120GB 120GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFQE1.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 85 86 87 89 86 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 5% Great: 85%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 13,169 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 9GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 1.8 3.6 3.6 3.7 2.4 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	6.13% Terrible	Read 24.7 Write 0.5 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 2.9 8% 8.7 MB/s	4K Read 8.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 30% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 6.13% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP698650-154-KEB Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 8GB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.2% Below average	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 8.9 28% 9.97 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 9.6 28% 9.77 GB/s	Latency 72.9 55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	48x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	39x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	34x

RAM
EBJ41UF8BDW0-GN-F 4x4GBElpidaBench 55%, 449 samples	7x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 58%, 7,298 samples	7x
99U5584-005.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 50%, 8,083 samples	6x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $384

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16