Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 15q-bu0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 15q-bu0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 832A
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190304
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateOct 17 '20 at 17:42
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 90
2-Core 163
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 246
33% 246 Pts
64-Core 248
15% 248 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 832A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7925
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
4.05% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 9.54
Parallax 6.97
5% 7.67 fps
MRender 0.1
Gravity 6.33
Splatting 0.13
2% 2.19 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.05%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$24
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 252 84 114 35 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
26% Poor
Read 338
Write 276
Mixed 12.4
SusWrite 126
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 9.7
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.4
18% 5.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 26%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$39
452GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 6.9 6.7 5.8 5.9 6.5 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.67% Terrible
Read 3
Write 5.7
Mixed 3.5
SusWrite 6.2
3% 4.6 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 2.67%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 859B CB8GS2666.C8JT 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60.9% Good
MC Read 21
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 17.8
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 19.4
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15q-bu0xx Builds (Compare 128 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15q-bu0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $24
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback