Acer Aspire E5-575G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-575G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Ironman_SK
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170303
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateOct 18 '20 at 17:01
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 91.6
2-Core 180
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 272
36% 272 Pts
64-Core 267
16% 267 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Acer(1025 1094) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6286
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
2.95% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 9.88
Parallax 6.62
0% 5.51 fps
MRender 9.95
Gravity 6.27
Splatting 14
9% 10.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.95%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$34
336GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX1P5J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 58 51 58 49 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 71.3
Write 59.3
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 55.4
39% 53.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT4G4SFS8213.C8FHP 04CB AO1P21FC4R1-B2MS 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
69.4% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 21.6
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 21.9
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-575G Builds (Compare 3,104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-575G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback