HP ProLiant SL170s G6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	30.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	HP ProLiant SL170s G6 (all builds)
Motherboard	HP
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110125
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 18 '17 at 12:36
Run Duration	261 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650 7,756 User benchmarks, average bench 64% Proc 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	68.8% Good	Memory 89 1-Core 66 2-Core 132 60% 95.6 Pts	4-Core 263 8-Core 501 46% 382 Pts	64-Core 973 60% 973 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 71%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 100 120GB-$60 4,424 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM11.2 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.4% Below average	Read 223 Write 74.1 Mixed 101 29% 133 MB/s	4K Read 12.7 4K Write 26.9 4K Mixed 6.35 42% 15.3 MB/s	DQ Read 176 DQ Write 44.1 DQ Mixed 16.7 36% 78.9 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 76%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 393GB free Firmware: 06.01D06 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 141 141 3908 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1272 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 72 72 20456 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1248 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BC) Unknown 97 97 12885098512 (BE) vendor-specific 62 58 656080934 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 138 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1133 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	78.2% Very good	Read 142 Write 131 Mixed 117 97% 130 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.49 4K Mixed 0.29 85% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 69%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 10GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	8.52% Terrible	Read 22.8 Write 5.92 Mixed 17.5 18% 15.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.65 4K Write 0.92 4K Mixed 1.41 96% 2.32 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.52% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 4x4GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4 of 16 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.1% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 7.3 22% 7.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.1 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 8.2 22% 7.53 GB/s	Latency 68.5 58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16