ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 30A6S0U300

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	21.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	93.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	56GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 56GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Lenovo 30A6S0U300 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory	52.5 GB free of 56 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151222
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 22 '20 at 00:26
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1607 v3 1,082 User benchmarks, average bench 70% LGA2011-3 SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	71.1% Very good	Memory 82 1-Core 91 2-Core 164 66% 112 Pts	4-Core 351 8-Core 341 46% 346 Pts	64-Core 348 22% 348 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90 64,240 User benchmarks, average bench 20% HP(103C 3421) 2GB CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	21.6% Poor	Lighting 24.6 Reflection 29.8 Parallax 29.6 20% 28 fps	MRender 29.7 Gravity 25.8 Splatting 32.8 24% 29.4 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE512 512GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 381GB free (System drive) Firmware: 6L0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 286 395 405 417 412 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	93.6% Outstanding	Read 450 Write 406 Mixed 195 SusWrite 366 79% 354 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 77.1 4K Mixed 33.3 132% 47.4 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 222 DQ Mixed 89.7 123% 229 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 93.6% Great: 94%
ST4000DM001-1FK1 4TB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 3.5TB free Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 112 106 108 122 110 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Read 99.6 Write 136 Mixed 86.2 SusWrite 109 24% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 12.3 4K Mixed 1 9% 4.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1.1 DQ Write 9.4 DQ Mixed 2.2 3% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 16%
WD Black 4TB (2012)-$323 4,113 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 3.5TB free Firmware: 1L01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 148 149 149 149 149 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	84.7% Excellent	Read 146 Write 138 Mixed 117 SusWrite 148 102% 137 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1.2 226% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 93%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$80 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2TB free Firmware: 0A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 119 121 121 120 118 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	68.6% Good	Read 120 Write 110 Mixed 99.8 SusWrite 119 83% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 100%
WD 40EFRX External 2TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 2.5TB free, PID 1100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 44 44 44 44 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	23.5% Poor	Read 44.1 Write 42.1 Mixed 38.1 SusWrite 43.9 57% 42 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 24%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA41GR7MFR4N-TF HMA41GR7MFR4N-TF HMA41GR7MFR4N-TF HMA41GR7MFR4N-TF HMA41GR7AFR4N-TF HMA41GR7MFR4N-TF ... 56GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	91.8% Outstanding	MC Read 31.7 MC Write 40.4 MC Mixed 34.2 101% 35.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 16.9 SC Mixed 19.9 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 76.9 52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 92% ↑ This bench: 91.8% Great: 92%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical 30A6S0U300 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

System: Lenovo 30A6S0U300

CPU
Xeon E5-1607 v3IntelBench 70%, 1,082 samples	1x
Xeon E5-2630 v3IntelBench 69%, 1,838 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon RX 460AMDBench 19%, 879 samples	1x
GeForce 8600 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 8,099 samples	1x

SSD
MZ7TE512 512GBSamsungBench 74%, 29 samples	1x
MZ7PD256HAFV-000H7 256GBSamsungBench 85%, 3,736 samples	1x

RAM
HMA41GR7MFR4N-TF HMA41GR7MFR4N-TF HMA41GR7MFR4N-TF HMA41GR7MFR4N-TF HMA41GR7AFR4N-TF HMA41GR7MFR4N-TF ... 56GBHynixBench 92%, 2 samples	1x
M378A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 8,407 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback