Today's hottest deals

Shuttle SH87R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemShuttle SH87R  (all builds)
MotherboardShuttle FH87
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160104
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 22 '20 at 02:22
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 106
2-Core 188
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 547
54% 443 Pts
64-Core 556
34% 556 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27% Poor
Lighting 33.2
Reflection 26.1
Parallax 26.4
27% 28.6 fps
MRender 33.3
Gravity 33.5
Splatting 32.2
27% 33 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 mSATA 500GB-$79
282GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 21 21 21 22 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 61% Great: 110%
Crucial MX300 750GB-$160
705GB free
Firmware: R060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 21 21 21 22 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 67% Great: 104%
Intel SSDSC2KW51 512GB
281GB free
Firmware: 004C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 240 234 255 264 262 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 453
Write 416
Mixed 412
SusWrite 263
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 96.4
4K Mixed 63.2
204% 69.1 MB/s
DQ Read 309
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 258
212% 302 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 113%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1333 C7 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
51.3% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 15.5
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 17.6
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SH87R Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Shuttle SH87R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $175
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback