Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics62.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive32.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C51
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 22 '20 at 13:50
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 84.6
1-Core 110
2-Core 220
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 678
69% 561 Pts
64-Core 902
56% 902 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
62.2% Good
Lighting 81.7
Reflection 72.8
Parallax 72.5
67% 75.7 fps
MRender 68.6
Gravity 74.8
Splatting 56.4
54% 66.6 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
JD 120GB 120GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JD2019
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 283 19 25 24 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 445
Write 413
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 77.3
53% 240 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
37% 8.87 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 112%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 120GB
35GB free, PID a00c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 36 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 38.3
Write 35.5
Mixed 37
SusWrite 37
50% 37 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 16.8
4K Mixed 8.9
922% 12.9 MB/s
DQ Read 13.4
DQ Write 17.7
DQ Mixed 8.8
951% 13.3 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 254%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
57.7% Above average
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 17.2
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 17.8
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 4,031 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $271
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback