Today's hottest deals

Acer TravelMate 5730

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAcer TravelMate 5730  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Homa
Memory1.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090811
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '17 at 14:03
Run Duration410 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T5870
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
36.5% Below average
Memory 65.7
1-Core 24.1
2-Core 44.5
32% 44.8 Pts
4-Core 45.4
8-Core 45.4
6% 45.4 Pts
64-Core 45.3
3% 45.3 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Acer(1025 013C) 796MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1892
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.39% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 0.42
Parallax 0.47
0% 0.46 fps
MRender 0.24
Gravity 0.33
Splatting 0.65
0% 0.41 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.39%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS542512K9SA00 120GB-$25
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BB2O Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 49.9
Write 51.3
Mixed 9.17
27% 36.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.13
4K Mixed 0.33
76% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 31%
CBM Flash Disk 2GB
2GB free, PID 6025
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
3.26% Terrible
Read 10.6
Write 2.98
Mixed 4.56
6% 6.04 MB/s
4K Read 4.32
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.02
17% 1.45 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.26%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 3.7
12% 4.2 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.2 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TravelMate 5730 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer TravelMate 5730

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $20
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback