Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X399 AORUS XTREME
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF  (all builds)
Memory47 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191211
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateOct 23 '20 at 17:44
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 64.4
1-Core 128
2-Core 252
79% 148 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 992
88% 746 Pts
64-Core 2,485
154% 2,485 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Zotac(19DA 7500) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 156
Reflection 145
Parallax 155
127% 152 fps
MRender 181
Gravity 130
Splatting 108
111% 140 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 117%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 490
Write 467
Mixed 351
97% 436 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 45.1
149% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 224
203% 309 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 126%
SanDisk Extreme Pro 960GB-$300
29GB free
Firmware: X212T0RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 113 119 118 108 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
63% Good
Read 496
Write 344
Mixed 159
SusWrite 140
63% 285 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 21.3
95% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 72
DQ Mixed 70.1
69% 115 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 63%
Great: 114%
Samsung Portable SSD T1 500GB
435GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 363 362 363 363 363 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 359
Write 357
Mixed 319
SusWrite 362
79% 349 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 31.2
4K Mixed 23.2
75% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 128
97% 129 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 77%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
281GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2274 605 606 606 606 608 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 2,521
Write 2,331
Mixed 1,730
SusWrite 884
417% 1,867 MB/s
4K Read 60.6
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 78.3
265% 92.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,043
DQ Write 898
DQ Mixed 980
732% 974 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 280%
Great: 340%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16
28GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 59 34 24 24 22 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 124
Write 54.7
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 36.5
85% 70.9 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.5
145% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D30CEST.16FD 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
140% Outstanding
MC Read 56.4
MC Write 56
MC Mixed 54.1
159% 55.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 33.6
SC Mixed 24.5
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 140%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF Builds (Compare 153 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS XTREME-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $1,880
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback