Today's hottest deals

Elsky M219FN-2C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemElsky M219FN-2C  (all builds)
MotherboardELSKY M219FN-2C
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180822
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 24 '20 at 08:36
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J1900
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Memory 56.9
1-Core 21.2
2-Core 41.2
28% 39.8 Pts
4-Core 72.3
8-Core 74.2
10% 73.2 Pts
64-Core 67.4
4% 67.4 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Intel(8086 2212) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4491
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.87% Terrible
Lighting 0.93
Reflection 1.12
Parallax 1
1% 1.02 fps
MRender 1.81
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.39
1% 1.34 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.87%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
BR 60G 60GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0927A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 69 71 80 81 81 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.3% Below average
Read 232
Write 77.2
Mixed 106
SusWrite 76
27% 123 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 33.4
4K Mixed 7.9
49% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 80.3
DQ Mixed 54.4
51% 80.3 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 42%
Netac OnlyDisk 125GB
116GB free, PID 3200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 23 14 19 21 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 30.7
Write 24.7
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 18.1
33% 25 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 2.1
141% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ASAD304GB-WIN 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.4% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.43 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4.4
10% 3.53 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M219FN-2C Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Elsky M219FN-2C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback