Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FB_X509FB

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FB_X509FB (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509FB
Memory	7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190828
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 24 '20 at 11:05
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	EGY-User
Background CPU	25%
CPU Throttled	88%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8265U 87,841 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	57.3% Above average	Memory 70.9 1-Core 63.2 2-Core 154 55% 95.9 Pts	4-Core 237 8-Core 416 39% 326 Pts	64-Core 368 23% 368 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 119F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7870 Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	3.7% Terrible	Lighting 5.03 Reflection 8.31 Parallax 3.78 4% 5.71 fps	MRender 4.67 Gravity 1.73 Splatting 4.17 3% 3.52 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.7% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar 256GB SSD 256GB 12,615 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 173GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0427C SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 257 252 258 310 340 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	65.1% Good	Read 372 Write 339 Mixed 324 SusWrite 284 74% 330 MB/s	4K Read 15.4 4K Write 25.7 4K Mixed 18.6 61% 19.9 MB/s	DQ Read 328 DQ Write 300 DQ Mixed 246 203% 291 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 240%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 372GB free Firmware: JU0C1J SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 98 83 91 96 97 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	69.2% Good	Read 144 Write 129 Mixed 55 SusWrite 94.9 77% 106 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.9 4K Mixed 0.6 234% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 859B CT8G4SFS8266.M8FD 12GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2400, 2667 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.5% Below average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 10.6 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 9.1 26% 9.07 GB/s	Latency 99.4 40% 99.4 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FB_X509FB Builds (Compare 168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FB_X509FB

CPU
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	123x
Core i3-8145UIntelBench 53%, 15,431 samples	30x
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	15x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	118x
MX110NvidiaBench 6%, 6,322 samples	50x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ3 256GBKingstonBench 97%, 7,536 samples	23x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	19x
WDC PC SN520 SDA 256GBNvmeBench 148%, 3,002 samples	13x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBMicronBench 57%, 2,923 samples	67x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 1x4GBMicronBench 33%, 1,799 samples	33x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBMicronBench 56%, 1,078 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16