HP Mini 110-3800

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Mini 110-3800  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3594
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '20 at 08:04
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N455
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Memory 28.2
1-Core 5
2-Core 5.1
11% 12.8 Pts
4-Core 6.8
8-Core 8.2
1% 7.5 Pts
64-Core 10.9
1% 10.9 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK6034GSX 60GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AH101M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 26 24 9.4 14 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
9.79% Terrible
Read 14.5
Write 23.4
Mixed 16.7
SusWrite 19.4
14% 18.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.2
45% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.79%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
6.93% Terrible
MC Read 2.3
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 2.3
7% 2.37 GB/s
SC Read 0.4
SC Write 2
SC Mixed 0.6
3% 1 GB/s
Latency 266
15% 266 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.93%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback