PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 37.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 33.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell PowerEdge T110 II |
Motherboard | Dell PowerEdge T110 II (all builds) |
Memory | 5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180524 |
Uptime | 109.1 Days |
Run Date | Oct 25 '20 at 19:02 |
Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 28% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1270 V2
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
65.9%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 290X-$549
Sapphire(174B E289) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 890 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.1.2
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
37.6%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 47 122 20 61 124 MB/s
|
33.2%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Constellation ES.3 1TB-$22
712GB free
Firmware: GA0F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 171 174 172 174 175 MB/s
|
92.1%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown HMT451U7BFR8A-PB 80AD000080AD HMT351U7CFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
51.7%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E3-1220 V2Intel $305Bench 69%, 3,748 samples | 21x |
Xeon E31220Intel $305Bench 68%, 2,507 samples | 16x |
Xeon E3-1240 V2Intel $345Bench 71%, 4,997 samples | 9x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 7x |
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 5x |
Radeon HD 5400ATIBench 1%, 10,400 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $364 |