ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 6458VMY

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Lenovo 6458VMY (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 6458VMY
Memory	6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080425
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Apr 21 '17 at 06:04
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T9500-$160 996 User benchmarks, average bench 39% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	42.5% Average	Memory 72.9 1-Core 38.1 2-Core 71.9 41% 61 Pts	4-Core 74 8-Core 72.8 10% 73.4 Pts	64-Core 74.2 5% 74.2 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 570M 446 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 20D9) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.0 Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	1.12% Terrible	Lighting 1.73 Reflection 1.88 Parallax 0.66 1% 1.42 fps	MRender 0.33 Gravity 1.23 Splatting 0.52 0% 0.7 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.12% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PA128HMCD-010 128GB 3,175 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 119GB free Firmware: AXM08L1Q Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6708 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3202 (AF) Unknown 99 99 4 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 99 99 11 (B2) Unknown 76 76 484 (B3) Unknown 78 78 862 (B4) Unknown 78 78 3170 (B5) Unknown 99 99 4 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 99 99 4 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 58 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (E9) Unknown 199 199 1214 (EA) Unknown 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 13 (EC) Unknown 99 99 130 (ED) Unknown 99 99 251 (EE) Unknown 99 99 862	20.1% Poor	Read 79.6 Write 57 Mixed 66.8 15% 67.8 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 22.8 4K Mixed 8.64 42% 14.6 MB/s	DQ Read 13.8 DQ Write 28.5 DQ Mixed 8.78 10% 17 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 51%
SanDisk Ultra 124GB 3,905 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 84GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Read 28.9 Write 11.4 Mixed 15.3 21% 18.5 MB/s	4K Read 2.99 4K Write 1.59 4K Mixed 0.75 91% 1.78 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16% Very poor	MC Read 5.8 MC Write 4.1 MC Mixed 4.3 14% 4.73 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 4.4 13% 4.57 GB/s	Latency 94.8 42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback