Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	34.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	ARLT Quattro Power Station GTX 650 Ti (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI B75A-G43 (MS-7758)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130325
Uptime	8.6 Days
Run Date	Oct 27 '20 at 00:26
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3450-$59 34,199 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	72.7% Very good	Memory 84.7 1-Core 95.2 2-Core 185 71% 122 Pts	4-Core 350 8-Core 364 47% 357 Pts	64-Core 356 22% 356 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Gainward(10B0 1184) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.55 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	34.6% Below average	Lighting 41.2 Reflection 38.5 Parallax 54 34% 44.6 fps	MRender 54.1 Gravity 47.6 Splatting 35.7 36% 45.8 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 300GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 440 451 462 435 354 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 489 Write 461 Mixed 426 SusWrite 426 101% 450 MB/s	4K Read 34 4K Write 57.3 4K Mixed 42.8 137% 44.7 MB/s	DQ Read 391 DQ Write 354 DQ Mixed 368 277% 371 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 129%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$63 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 865GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 104 105 105 106 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Read 99 Write 103 Mixed 52 SusWrite 104 66% 89.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5584-020.A00LF 99U5474-023.A00LF 99U5584-020.A00LF 99U5474-023.A00LF 16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	56.5% Above average	MC Read 19.9 MC Write 21.9 MC Mixed 17.7 57% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 16.7 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 72.2 55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 15%

Tree trunk

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	3x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	2x
Sata III 128GBIntensoBench 67%, 2,059 samples	1x

RAM
99U5584-005.A00LF 99U5474-023.A00LF Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 99U5474-023.A00LF 16GBKingstonBench 51%, 3 samples	2x
99U5584-020.A00LF 99U5474-023.A00LF 99U5584-020.A00LF 99U5474-023.A00LF 16GBKingstonBench 58%, 5 samples	2x
99U5584-004.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 154 samples	2x

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $228

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16