Today's hottest deals

Blade Shadow Computer

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics98% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemBlade Shadow Computer  (all builds)
MotherboardBlade ShadowM
Memory8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 27 '20 at 22:10
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Memory 72.2
1-Core 80.6
2-Core 161
61% 105 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 514
40% 358 Pts
64-Core 500
31% 500 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P5000
Nvidia(10DE 11B2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1733 MHz, MLim: 2256 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 442.92
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 129
Parallax 124
105% 127 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 120
Splatting 94.7
85% 105 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 98%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 275GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 113 119 123 118 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 108%
Qemu HARDDISK 275GB
256GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 119 119 119 119 119 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Blade PRXT12Y746AUZ9-J81 1x12GB
1 of 1 slots used
12GB DIMM RAM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
97.1% Outstanding
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 37
MC Mixed 39.5
110% 38.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 16.6
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 96.4
42% 96.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Shadow Computer Builds (Compare 632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Blade Shadow Computer

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback