Lenovo F0CC000QLD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo F0CC000QLD  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Gardenia CRB
Memory2.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170206
Uptime4 Days
Run DateOct 29 '20 at 03:36
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-9210 APU (2016 M.SR)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Memory 20.2
1-Core 44.2
2-Core 60.1
24% 41.5 Pts
4-Core 59.5
8-Core 55.4
8% 57.5 Pts
64-Core 62.2
4% 62.2 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Legend(17AA 36BE) 384MB
Ram: 384MB, Driver: 16.6
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
2.51% Terrible
Lighting 2.97
Reflection 5.73
Parallax 4.03
2% 4.24 fps
MRender 2.81
Gravity 2.83
Splatting 3.91
3% 3.19 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.51%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
873GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 126 134 146 156 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 160
Write 134
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 140
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.3
227% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 86%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3270MB76H8F2400 RMSA3270MB86H9F2400 6GB
2400, 2400 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 5.7
16% 5.5 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 5
13% 4.7 GB/s
Latency 319
12% 319 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback