Dell Precision M6700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics37% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision M6700  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0JWMFY
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 29 '20 at 16:46
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3940XM-$344
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
80% Excellent
Memory 91.8
1-Core 79.5
2-Core 200
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 508
56% 440 Pts
64-Core 508
31% 508 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000M
Dell(1028 053F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1013 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 354.45
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
37% Below average
Lighting 44.9
Reflection 41.9
Parallax 37.3
37% 41.4 fps
MRender 51.4
Gravity 40.4
Splatting 47.3
38% 46.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37%
Great: 37%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 5 Volume 240GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 60 52 48 53 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 326
Write 54
Mixed 165
SusWrite 53.8
33% 150 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 17.1
47% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 91.5
DQ Mixed 147
118% 172 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 141%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 32GB
12GB free, PID 556b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.9 1.9 4.8 3.3 4.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
6.76% Terrible
Read 21.2
Write 2.8
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 3.7
8% 8.23 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 2
103% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.76%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
32.6% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 9.2
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 10.2
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision M6700 Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision M6700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback