Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Supermicro SYS-6028R-TDWNR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Supermicro SYS-6028R-TDWNR (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X10DDW-iN
Memory	110.8 GB free of 127.996 GB @ 2.4 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160817
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 29 '20 at 17:54
Run Duration	321 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 2,624 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	Memory 54.7 1-Core 94.5 2-Core 185 61% 111 Pts	4-Core 341 8-Core 613 57% 477 Pts	64-Core 1,232 76% 1,232 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 70%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 441 440 439 440 439 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 461 Write 452 Mixed 344 SusWrite 439 96% 424 MB/s	4K Read 37.7 4K Write 89.2 4K Mixed 49.2 167% 58.7 MB/s	DQ Read 290 DQ Write 278 DQ Mixed 271 207% 280 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 124%
Nvme INTEL SSDPE2MD02 2TB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 875GB free Firmware: 0171 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1948 1950 1956 1936 1955 1949 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	306% Outstanding	Read 1,113 Write 1,994 Mixed 855 SusWrite 1,949 336% 1,478 MB/s	4K Read 37 4K Write 273 4K Mixed 54.8 271% 121 MB/s	DQ Read 1,460 DQ Write 1,327 DQ Mixed 1,288 995% 1,358 MB/s
Poor: 246% ↑ This bench: 306% Great: 306%
Nvme INTEL SSDPE2MX45 450GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 120% 150GB free Firmware: 0271 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 450 421 658 582 194 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	141% Outstanding	Read 474 Write 656 Mixed 470 SusWrite 459 116% 515 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 256 4K Mixed 41.2 230% 108 MB/s	DQ Read 517 DQ Write 658 DQ Mixed 579 439% 585 MB/s
Poor: 100% ↑ This bench: 141% Great: 141%
Nvme INTEL SSDPED1K75 750GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 460% 699GB free Firmware: 0435 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1989 1998 2008 2006 2007 1957 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	533% Outstanding	Read 2,201 Write 1,987 Mixed 2,084 SusWrite 1,994 466% 2,067 MB/s	4K Read 255 4K Write 253 4K Mixed 254 846% 254 MB/s	DQ Read 1,374 DQ Write 1,316 DQ Mixed 1,325 1,000% 1,338 MB/s
Poor: 366% ↑ This bench: 533% Great: 533%
Seagate ST2000NM0008-2F3100 2TB 656 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 204GB free Firmware: SN02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 169 170 170 171 171 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 182 Write 179 Mixed 86.6 SusWrite 170 113% 154 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 267% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 110%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 950GB 636 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 680GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 68 71 87 73 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	45.7% Average	Read 81.6 Write 108 Mixed 53.4 SusWrite 76.4 59% 79.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.3 300% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 142%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G3D1 4x31.8GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 4 of 16 slots used 127GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	61.3% Good	MC Read 26.6 MC Write 21.1 MC Mixed 20.9 65% 22.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 19.2 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 144 28% 144 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 138%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback