Panasonic FZG1-3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8.02GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8.02GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 26% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemPanasonic FZG1-3  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic FZG1-3
Memory4.6 GB free of 8.01563 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150716
Uptime10.5 Days
Run DateOct 30 '20 at 04:04
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 26%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5300U
IC1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
46% Average
Memory 57
1-Core 90.9
2-Core 155
57% 101 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 200
27% 202 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 46%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Device(10F7 8338) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
3.96% Terrible
Lighting 3.93
Reflection 5.38
Parallax 5.16
3% 4.82 fps
MRender 6.76
Gravity 3.93
Splatting 8.48
5% 6.39 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.96%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HG6 mSATA 128GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JUPA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 303 206 262 349 286 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 375
Write 145
Mixed 255
SusWrite 269
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 18.1
64% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 307
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 218
170% 236 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown FZG1-3 5LTSA21657 0032 FZG1-3 5LTSA21657 56GB
1600, 1600, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 49152 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.8% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 17.1
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 15.8
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FZG1-3 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Panasonic FZG1-3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback