Asrock FM2A75M-HD+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics25% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A75M-HD+  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131120
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 22 '17 at 16:06
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon X4 880K-$105
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
54.1% Above average
Memory 66.4
1-Core 78
2-Core 146
56% 96.6 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 244
32% 244 Pts
64-Core 246
15% 246 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1046.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
25% Poor
Lighting 29.4
Reflection 33.8
Parallax 41.8
24% 35 fps
MRender 29.8
Gravity 26.6
Splatting 39.9
27% 32.1 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 25%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV400S37240G 240GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 461
Write 166
Mixed 127
54% 252 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 45.9
4K Mixed 10.2
81% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 23.4
54% 115 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 77%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
360GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 139
Mixed 133
117% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 2.28
4K Mixed 0.28
97% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 109%
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 165GB-$46
153GB free
Firmware: P22O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 67.8
Write 57.6
Mixed 58.1
46% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.78
4K Mixed 0.37
100% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 39%
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$30
76GB free
Firmware: 11.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 47.5
Write 42.3
Mixed 45.7
34% 45.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.27
84% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX Transcend JM1333KLH-4G 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.7% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 12.5
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 9.6
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A75M-HD+ Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75M-HD+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $116
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback