Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive86.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX CODE  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171225
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateNov 01 '20 at 18:25
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$232
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Memory 97.1
1-Core 141
2-Core 258
94% 166 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 688
73% 582 Pts
64-Core 711
44% 711 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550
Nvidia(10DE 1455) ≥ 4GB; KFA2 GeForce RTX 3080 SG (1-Click OC)
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 457.09
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 245
Reflection 214
Parallax 288
199% 249 fps
Gravity 218
Splatting 133
149% 175 fps
Poor: 163% Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force GS 180GB-$134
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 156 156 153 158 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 370
Write 251
Mixed 247
SusWrite 157
57% 256 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 46.6
169% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 222
166% 222 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 86%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
160GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 470 471 417 318 317 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 491
Mixed 463
SusWrite 409
106% 470 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 63.1
216% 78.1 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 361
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 129%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
582GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 147 148 149 151 149 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 140
Mixed 88.4
SusWrite 148
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$192
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 35.1
MC Mixed 26.6
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 35.4
SC Mixed 29.4
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 50
80% 50 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback