Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire X3470

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire X3470  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire X3470
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111220
Uptime11 Days
Run DateNov 02 '20 at 00:39
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3820 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Memory 56
1-Core 38.6
2-Core 75.2
36% 56.6 Pts
4-Core 98.9
8-Core 101
13% 100 Pts
64-Core 59.3
4% 59.3 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6550D
Acer(1025 061D) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
3.69% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 5.92
Parallax 4.66
4% 5.09 fps
MRender 3.76
Gravity 4.03
Splatting 4.52
3% 4.11 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.69%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$46
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 82 81 79 79 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 75.8
Write 94.8
Mixed 74
SusWrite 80.2
60% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR512X64D3U13C9G ACR512X64D3U13C9G 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
25.4% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 9.7
27% 9.33 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 5.4
13% 4.6 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire X3470 Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire X3470

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback