Gigabyte B360M H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte B360M H  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180222
Uptime14 Days
Run DateNov 02 '20 at 08:54
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Memory 94
1-Core 137
2-Core 271
93% 167 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 801
82% 661 Pts
64-Core 1,027
64% 1,027 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Lighting 38.7
Reflection 29.5
Parallax 36.8
32% 35 fps
MRender 37.6
Gravity 37.1
Splatting 35
30% 36.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480 GB 480GB
360GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG3000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 74 66 107 162 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
42% Average
Read 438
Write 294
Mixed 253
SusWrite 107
60% 273 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 23.8
4K Mixed 8.1
53% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 61.5
DQ Write 61.5
DQ Mixed 22.1
27% 48.4 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42%
Great: 57%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
2TB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 191 182 193 192 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 177
Mixed 38
SusWrite 189
105% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 106%
Great: 108%
WD 10EADS External 1TB
137GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 37 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
20% Very poor
Read 38
Write 38
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 39
49% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20%
Great: 21%
SAMSUNG HM160JC 160GB
51GB free, PID 6830
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 32 32 33 33 33 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 35.7
Write 31.2
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 32.2
41% 30.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FE 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
41.3% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 10.5
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.1
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 59.7
67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B360M H Builds (Compare 1,010 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte B360M H - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $402
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback