Today's hottest deals

Cyberpowerpc Tracer R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics74.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive257% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemCyberpowerpc Tracer R  (all builds)
MotherboardCyberPowerPC Tracer R
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200901
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateNov 02 '20 at 16:43
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Memory 72.9
1-Core 151
2-Core 305
93% 176 Pts
4-Core 599
8-Core 1,136
103% 867 Pts
64-Core 1,473
91% 1,473 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Device(1D05 1100) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.9.2
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.3% Very good
Lighting 94.6
Reflection 98.2
Parallax 85.7
77% 92.8 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 77.8
Splatting 76.7
69% 85.6 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 83%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
884GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1463 841 841 844 841 841 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
257% Outstanding
Read 1,586
Write 1,848
Mixed 1,468
SusWrite 945
329% 1,462 MB/s
4K Read 52.6
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 80.4
282% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,248
DQ Write 958
DQ Mixed 1,149
847% 1,118 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 257%
Great: 276%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LD4AS008G-H2666G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
MC Read 36.6
MC Write 35
MC Mixed 31.3
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 18.4
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 94.9
42% 94.9 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Tracer R Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Cyberpowerpc Tracer R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $120
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback