Today's hottest deals

Intel X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics35.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive139% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200629
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 02 '20 at 16:57
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-4650 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 69.9
1-Core 69.5
2-Core 147
56% 95.3 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 438
42% 347 Pts
64-Core 677
42% 677 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1230 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.1
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.6% Below average
Lighting 40.3
Reflection 59.5
Parallax 55.1
33% 51.7 fps
MRender 59.3
Gravity 41.5
Splatting 50.2
41% 50.3 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$70
438GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 664 416 417 416 420 416 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 1,269
Write 1,367
Mixed 890
SusWrite 458
223% 996 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 71.8
4K Mixed 42.8
136% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 472
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 415
306% 405 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 139%
Great: 237%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team TEAMGROUP-UD3 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
43% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 14.8
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 7.5
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 550 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $104
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback