Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook Folio 9470m

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics3.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 1 month old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
10 years ago, 10 years ago.
SystemHP EliteBook Folio 9470m  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18DF
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131008
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateJun 24 '14 at 23:25
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3437U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 72.9
2-Core 116
44% 94.5 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 206
28% 206 Pts
64-Core 211
13% 211 Pts
Poor: 35% Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 18DF) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 9.18.10.3165
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.43% Terrible
Lighting 3.87
Reflection 5.31
Parallax 2.84
3% 4.01 fps
MRender 3.67
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 7.48
4% 4.48 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.43%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 128GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 408
Write 181
Mixed 233
60% 274 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 5.06
53% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 7.11
52% 125 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 70%
Apricorn SATAWire 240GB
223GB free, PID 0040
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 29.4
Write 21.7
Mixed 25
32% 25.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.87
4K Write 5.44
4K Mixed 3.52
326% 4.94 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 79%
Typical EliteBook Folio 9470m Builds (Compare 965 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook Folio 9470m

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $217Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback