Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 520-$70 23,644 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	44.7% Average	Memory 61.8 1-Core 46.7 2-Core 90.4 41% 66.3 Pts	4-Core 162 8-Core 161 22% 161 Pts	64-Core 155 10% 155 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 215A) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.63% Terrible	Lighting 0.67 Reflection 0.88 Parallax 0.66 0% 0.74 fps	MRender 1.05 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.26 1% 0.94 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.63% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
KingFast 120GB 1,476 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFQ6AL3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 47 47 47 53 48 MB/s Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.8% Average	Read 224 Write 207 Mixed 197 SusWrite 64 39% 173 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 44.8 4K Mixed 23.9 87% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 151 DQ Write 164 DQ Mixed 130 105% 148 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 83%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 64GB 1,850 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 15GB free, PID 5571 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 7.1 3.1 11 10 10 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	7.95% Terrible	Read 30 Write 12.2 Mixed 10 SusWrite 8.5 17% 15.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 2.8 118% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.95% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SH564568FH8NWPHSFG 0194 SH564568FH8NZPHSCG 4GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 667, 667 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.3% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 10 23% 8.17 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 5.5 15% 5.17 GB/s	Latency 122 33% 122 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16