Asus P8Z77-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics59.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateNov 02 '20 at 23:07
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 94.2
1-Core 114
2-Core 203
80% 137 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 566
58% 468 Pts
64-Core 557
34% 557 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
Asus(1043 8655) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.9% Above average
Lighting 74.7
Reflection 76.5
Parallax 73.8
61% 75 fps
MRender 70
Gravity 69.3
Splatting 72.5
58% 70.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM03B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 202 216 214 231 231 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 354
Write 279
Mixed 235
SusWrite 222
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 71.9
4K Mixed 31.3
119% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 115
114% 185 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 116%
Kingston SKC2500M8500G 500GB
237GB free
Firmware: S7780100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1855 998 738 732 571 444 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 2,136
Write 1,870
Mixed 1,557
SusWrite 889
361% 1,613 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 69.7
222% 82.3 MB/s
DQ Read 836
DQ Write 578
DQ Mixed 576
465% 663 MB/s
Poor: 163%
This bench: 241%
Great: 334%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
127GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 103 103 103 104 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 104
Write 101
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 102
71% 96.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 65%
WD WD3200KS-00PFB0 320GB
286GB free
Firmware: 21.00M21
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 56 60 63 62 58 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 61.3
Write 60.7
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 60
42% 57.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 36%
Maxtor 6B200M0 137GB
71GB free
Firmware: BANC1B70
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 58 57 57 57 57 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.1% Below average
Read 59.9
Write 60.1
Mixed 35.3
SusWrite 57.7
39% 53.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.4
150% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 34%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
555GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 111 109 111 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 112
Write 105
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 110
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
57.9% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 17.1
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 19.5
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 59.2
68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V PRO Builds (Compare 2,083 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V PRO - $400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $855
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback