Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Notebook P65_P67RGRERA (all builds)
Motherboard	Notebook P65_P67RGRERA
Memory	15.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160202
Uptime	2.5 Days
Run Date	Nov 05 '20 at 06:12
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6820HK 20,362 User benchmarks, average bench 69% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	36.3% Below average	Memory 50.8 1-Core 42.7 2-Core 66.6 34% 53.4 Pts	4-Core 118 8-Core 289 23% 204 Pts	64-Core 473 29% 473 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Clevo(1558 6540) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8853 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.06% Terrible	Lighting 3.13 Reflection 52.3 Parallax 3.38 3% 19.6 fps	MRender 5.05 Gravity 2.87 Splatting 6.35 4% 4.75 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.06% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 250GB 28,058 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT21B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 186 164 162 165 163 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	60.7% Good	Read 385 Write 361 Mixed 324 SusWrite 173 70% 311 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 31.6 4K Mixed 20.9 72% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 330 DQ Write 229 DQ Mixed 251 195% 270 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 122%
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 250GB 28,058 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 201GB free Firmware: EMT21B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 226 213 214 211 216 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	67.7% Good	Read 387 Write 372 Mixed 318 SusWrite 213 72% 323 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 33.2 4K Mixed 20.9 84% 26.8 MB/s	DQ Read 277 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 265 212% 293 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 122%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 378GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 26 25 24 23 23 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Seagate Laptop SSHD 2.5" 1TB-$41 64,201 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 714GB free Firmware: SM36 SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 7.7 8.7 9.7 11 13 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 19% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 3x8GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 3 of 4 slots used 24GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 21.3 MC Mixed 19.6 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 13.4 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 158 25% 158 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 85%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	157x
Core i7-6820HKIntelBench 69%, 20,362 samples	24x

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	55x
GeForce GTX 980MNvidiaBench 39%, 10,379 samples	46x
GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 21,995 samples	40x

SSD
850 EVO M.2 250GBSamsungBench 102%, 28,058 samples	25x
850 EVO M.2 500GBSamsungBench 110%, 25,072 samples	14x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsung $250Bench 199%, 40,327 samples	6x

RAM
M471A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 20,956 samples	27x
16ATF1G64HZ-2G1A2 2x8GBMicronBench 69%, 6,021 samples	15x
HyperX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBKingstonBench 77%, 2,917 samples	14x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16