Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (86%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-350 6,654 User benchmarks, average bench 25% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	18.7% Very poor	Memory 33.6 1-Core 14.6 2-Core 7.6 15% 18.6 Pts	4-Core 24.7 8-Core 23.3 3% 24 Pts	64-Core 37 2% 37 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0520) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.1003 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.87% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.42 Parallax 1.25 1% 1.22 fps	MRender 1.48 Gravity 0.63 Splatting 1.39 1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.87% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$68 21,137 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 430GB free (System drive) Firmware: PB4OC60F SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 63 65 69 73 79 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	41.1% Average	Read 72.8 Write 83 Mixed 42.3 SusWrite 70.3 49% 67.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Kingston ACR256X64D3S1333C9 6GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 3.7 MC Mixed 4.4 12% 4.13 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 1.7 SC Mixed 3.1 7% 2.37 GB/s	Latency 235 17% 235 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
SU 650 120GBAdataBench 56%, 342 samples	1x
Solid State Disk 128GBSpccBench 69%, 14,793 samples	1x

RAM
ACR256X64D3S1333C9 2x2GBKingstonBench 29%, 3,134 samples	4x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	3x
M471B2873FHS-CF8 Elpida EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F 3GBSamsungBench 15%, 3 samples	2x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28