HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteBook Folio 1040 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2270
Memory0.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150310
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateNov 05 '20 at 10:20
Run Duration87 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
49.4% Average
Memory 70.6
1-Core 86.6
2-Core 122
57% 93.2 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 197
23% 178 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
HP(103C 2270) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.09% Terrible
Lighting 4.27
Reflection 5.65
Parallax 5.25
4% 5.06 fps
MRender 5.52
Gravity 4.27
Splatting 8.65
5% 6.15 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.09%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7TN3Q-256G-1006 256GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2180306
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 334
Write 222
Mixed 111
49% 222 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 61.7
4K Mixed 26.5
105% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 126
132% 220 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1L16BC4R1-B1YS Hynix HMT851S6AMR6R-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.2% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 13
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 11.8
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook Folio 1040 G2 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback