Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 6.43%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon 3.00GHz 51 User benchmarks, average bench 25% CPU_0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	6.43% Terrible	Memory 9.11 1-Core 8.2 2-Core 17.8 7% 11.7 Pts	4-Core 20.5 8-Core 30.2 3% 25.4 Pts	64-Core 49 3% 49 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 6.43% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MK7559GSXP 750GB-$118 5,761 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 644GB free (System drive) Firmware: GN001U SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 48 45 44 51 49 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	24.6% Poor	Read 39 Write 39.2 Mixed 23.3 SusWrite 46.4 27% 37 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.4 83% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 56%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105 18,464 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 14GB free Firmware: 06.01D06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 22 26 29 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	10% Very poor	Read 9.5 Write 24.2 Mixed 11.5 SusWrite 25.1 13% 17.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 87% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GT72U4ND1BD-3C 4x4GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM 667 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	2.15% Terrible	MC Read 0.6 MC Write 0.3 MC Mixed 0.7 2% 0.53 GB/s	SC Read 0.3 SC Write 0.8 SC Mixed 0.3 1% 0.47 GB/s	Latency 412 10% 412 ns
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.15% Great: 18%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM