Lenovo 056849U

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.87% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 056849U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory38.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130201
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateNov 09 '20 at 03:04
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670-$53
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 70.5
1-Core 64.2
2-Core 130
53% 88.4 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 481
45% 374 Pts
64-Core 769
48% 769 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 4800
Nvidia(10DE 0594) 1.5GB
Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 342.00
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
6.29% Terrible
Lighting 8.5
Reflection 5.58
Parallax 3.97
7% 6.02 fps
MRender 7.38
Gravity 6.23
Splatting 5.35
5% 6.32 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.29%
Great: 7%
Nvidia Quadro FX 3800
Nvidia(10DE 0661) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.00
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
6.87% Terrible
Lighting 9.3
Reflection 8.12
Parallax 8.38
8% 8.6 fps
MRender 8.24
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 5.35
6% 6.93 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.87%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 500GB
320GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 403
Write 272
Mixed 292
71% 322 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 52.6
4K Mixed 25.4
94% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 35
110% 239 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 118%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$63
716GB free
Firmware: 1A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 100
Write 60.7
Mixed 70.3
58% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.8
184% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K73CHD- 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
42.5% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 14.9
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 8.2
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 056849U Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 056849U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $193
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback