Today's hottest deals

Asus Z87-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z87-A  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2160 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140815
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 10 '20 at 04:39
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$65
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 103
2-Core 202
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 390
52% 386 Pts
64-Core 376
23% 376 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
Nvidia(10DE 146B) ≥ 4GB; 9001G1422510000
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 171
Reflection 163
Parallax 207
139% 180 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 152
Splatting 127
125% 157 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 128%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 485
Write 211
Mixed 146
61% 281 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 36.9
135% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 104
122% 216 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WDC WD80 EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB
5.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 0.5 0.4 0 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 171
Write 175
Mixed 117
SusWrite 0.8
146% 116 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 62%
WDC WD10 03FBYX-01Y7B1 1TB
234GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 4.4 0.9 0.2 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
21.8% Poor
Read 89
Write 90
Mixed 74
SusWrite 4.1
82% 64.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
120% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 55%
WDC WD20 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 124 125 125 125 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 122
Write 124
Mixed 88.8
SusWrite 124
155% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
41% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 61%
WDC WD80 EFAX-68LHPN0 8TB
7.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 128 125 125 125 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 184
Write 194
Mixed 134
SusWrite 126
213% 160 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.1
211% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1867 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.1% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 7.9
25% 8.83 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 8.8
25% 8.7 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87-A Builds (Compare 3,040 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Z87-A - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $654
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback