Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 27 '17 at 15:55
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$143
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 90.9
1-Core 107
2-Core 213
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 665
65% 533 Pts
64-Core 832
52% 832 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 381.89
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 23
Parallax 18.7
16% 20.5 fps
MRender 28.7
Gravity 20.1
Splatting 26
20% 24.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZHPU512HCGL-00004 512GB
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UXM6501Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 87%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 145
Write 151
Mixed 123
105% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 2.93
4K Mixed 0.17
99% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 100%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 120
Write 112
Mixed 111
86% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 2.57
4K Mixed 0.23
90% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 100%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
397GB free
Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 92.2
Write 90.3
Mixed 87.9
68% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 0.74
4K Mixed 0.17
61% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 96%
ST4000DX 001-1CE168 4TB
2TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 153
Write 148
Mixed 113
173% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 5.38
4K Mixed 0.58
205% 2.14 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 74%
WDC WD30 03FZEX-00Z4SA0 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.2% Average
Read 113
Write 106
Mixed 93.1
132% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.01
4K Write 2.77
4K Mixed 0.35
110% 1.38 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 48%
ST3000VN 000-1HJ166 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 127
Write 119
Mixed 93.1
142% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.19
63% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 49%
ST2000DM 001-1CH164 2TB
339GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
56% Above average
Read 152
Write 140
Mixed 86.7
155% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.12
4K Mixed 0.25
48% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 56%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 42.7
MC Write 43.2
MC Mixed 41.3
121% 42.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 22.2
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 102%
This bench: 109%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,891 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $884
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback