Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	27.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 650-$70 42,063 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	Memory 70.5 1-Core 64.2 2-Core 114 51% 82.8 Pts	4-Core 176 8-Core 183 24% 180 Pts	64-Core 190 12% 190 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 372E) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	Lighting 33.6 Reflection 24.5 Parallax 30.7 27% 29.6 fps	MRender 37.5 Gravity 32.6 Splatting 31.4 27% 33.8 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 28%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$30 20,238 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 155GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 140 81 76 83 84 MB/s Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	59.4% Above average	Read 248 Write 178 Mixed 212 SusWrite 110 42% 187 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 56.6 4K Mixed 31 112% 38.4 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 151 123% 174 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMR1870EC58E9F1333 Micron 16KTF51264AZ-1G4M1 8GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.4% Below average	MC Read 10 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 12.7 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.6 SC Write 7.1 SC Mixed 7.8 21% 7.5 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16