MSI Z77A-G41 (MS-7758)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7758
MotherboardMSI Z77A-G41 (MS-7758)  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 28 '17 at 10:49
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 95.7
2-Core 186
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 359
48% 358 Pts
64-Core 359
22% 359 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
PwrHis(1787 2317) 3GB
CLim: 955 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.4.3
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.8% Below average
Lighting 39.6
Reflection 27.7
Parallax 37.7
32% 35 fps
MRender 29
Gravity 45
Splatting 38
31% 37.3 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 514
Write 407
Mixed 414
99% 445 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 70.5
4K Mixed 19.8
106% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 35
DQ Write 83.9
DQ Mixed 19.5
26% 46.1 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 115%
WD Black 500GB (2012)-$49
169GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 129
Mixed 164
121% 161 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 2.67
4K Mixed 0.26
95% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBSR2 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.1% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 9.7
32% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10.7
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 69.6
57% 69.6 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77A-G41 (MS-7758) Builds (Compare 721 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI Z77A-G41 (MS-7758) - $232

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback