Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardJGINYUE X99M-PLUS
Memory29 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200414
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 13 '20 at 22:24
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 82
1-Core 85.9
2-Core 197
69% 122 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 693
62% 525 Pts
64-Core 1,378
85% 1,378 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.11.1
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
47.6% Average
Lighting 58.7
Reflection 63.9
Parallax 74.4
48% 65.7 fps
MRender 64.2
Gravity 57.2
Splatting 53.2
47% 58.2 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel HBRPEKNX0101AH 256GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 448 29 90 29 37 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 769
Write 457
Mixed 505
SusWrite 181
106% 478 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 99.1
4K Mixed 55.2
181% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 458
DQ Mixed 213
192% 280 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 113%
Great: 145%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70QH0-CMA 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1867 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (95th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.3% Good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 20.2
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 19
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 15,302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback