Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics56.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory29.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 14 '20 at 04:47
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$127
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
70% Good
Memory 91
1-Core 74.8
2-Core 130
62% 98.7 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 396
41% 331 Pts
64-Core 428
26% 428 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 70%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$131
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Lighting 70
Reflection 68
Parallax 84.1
57% 74 fps
MRender 72.3
Gravity 77.4
Splatting 58
56% 69.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct500mx5 0 500GB
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 375 372 371 354 347 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 445
Write 396
Mixed 398
SusWrite 365
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 83.7
4K Mixed 48.6
159% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 230
176% 239 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 101%
Great: 119%
Huh72101 0ALE601 10TB
7TB free
Firmware: LHGLX354
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 194 214 225 211 201 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 223
Write 227
Mixed 110
SusWrite 206
140% 192 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 1.1
338% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 124%
Great: 129%
Huh72101 0ALE601 10TB
9.5TB free
Firmware: LHGLX354
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 240 238 247 246 246 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 78% Great: 129%
WD WD14 0EMFZ-11A0WA0 14TB
11TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 195 211 208 206 212 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
119% Outstanding
Read 216
Write 191
Mixed 98.2
SusWrite 196
128% 175 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 0.3
474% 5.07 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 119%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 19.1
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 13
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,878 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $411
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback