Inspur P3310

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemInspur P3310  (all builds)
MotherboardStandard To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160111
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateNov 14 '20 at 21:49
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 77.2
1-Core 80.8
2-Core 134
59% 97.3 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 227
31% 230 Pts
64-Core 222
14% 222 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Intel(8086 1916) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 5.87
Reflection 8.27
Parallax 5.81
5% 6.65 fps
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 0.13
2% 3.12 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-128M6S-HP 2TB
749GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXT3003Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 365 370 376 382 360 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 422
Write 378
Mixed 334
SusWrite 366
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 80.3
4K Mixed 35.2
129% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 314
243% 334 MB/s
Realtek RTL9210 NVME 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 358 368 369 371 360 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 320
Write 191
Mixed 236
SusWrite 362
62% 277 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 35.8
4K Mixed 27.4
87% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 136
99% 128 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HXMSH4GS03A1F1CL16 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.9% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 15.9
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 85.9
47% 85.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback