Packard iMedia S2883

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPackard iMedia S2883  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard iMedia S2883
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140428
Uptime5.6 Days
Run DateNov 18 '20 at 09:22
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J1900
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Memory 49.8
1-Core 17.2
2-Core 36.5
25% 34.5 Pts
4-Core 42.1
8-Core 59.7
6% 50.9 Pts
64-Core 46
3% 46 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Acer(1025 085E) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.89% Terrible
Lighting 0.87
Reflection 1.19
Parallax 0.97
1% 1.01 fps
MRender 1.76
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.83
1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.89%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
388GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 33 20 47 70 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 85.2
Write 91.8
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 56.9
53% 71.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
130% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT425S6AFR6A-PB Micron 8KTF25664HZ-1G6M1 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 6.5
17% 6.03 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 3.5
8% 2.97 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMedia S2883 Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard iMedia S2883

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback