Asus P8P67 REV 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 REV 3.1  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110815
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateNov 19 '20 at 18:11
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400S-$70
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 88.6
1-Core 78
2-Core 171
67% 113 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 290
40% 297 Pts
64-Core 313
19% 313 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Lighting 34.8
Reflection 25.4
Parallax 26.4
28% 28.9 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 33.8
Splatting 33.6
29% 35.1 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 109 48 53 32 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 324
Write 224
Mixed 64.1
SusWrite 74.6
38% 172 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 44.4
4K Mixed 28.5
96% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 86
82% 129 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 82%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
317GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 68 68 67 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 83.7
Write 90.4
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 67.6
54% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 74%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
353GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 27 27 27 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 24.9
Mixed 23.9
SusWrite 26.3
36% 26.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Transcend JM1333KLN-4G Transcend JM1333KLN-4G 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
52.2% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.7
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 16.4
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 REV 3.1 Builds (Compare 555 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 REV 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $546
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback