MSI A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics6.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7721
MotherboardMSI A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721)  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181101
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateNov 19 '20 at 23:15
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-7480 Radeon R5, 8 Compute Cores 2C+6G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Memory 42.4
1-Core 56.9
2-Core 75.5
36% 58.3 Pts
4-Core 96.5
8-Core 93.5
13% 95 Pts
64-Core 83.8
5% 83.8 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
MSI(1462 7721) 384MB
Ram: 384MB, Driver: 20.11.1
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.7% Terrible
Lighting 8.6
Reflection 6.81
Parallax 11.6
7% 9.01 fps
MRender 5.38
Gravity 8.3
Splatting 8.17
6% 7.28 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.7%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$30
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 23 23 18 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 38% Great: 86%
Hitachi HTS541616J9SA00 160GB-$82
61GB free
Firmware: SB4OC7DP
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 35 35 34 34 35 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 38.2
Write 28.2
Mixed 21.4
SusWrite 34.1
22% 30.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
82% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston 99U5402-027.A01LF 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 5.4
17% 6.03 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 2.8
13% 4.53 GB/s
Latency 191
21% 191 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721) Builds (Compare 1,085 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $63
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback