Asus P8Z68-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110624
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateNov 20 '20 at 14:22
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 84%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 86.6
2-Core 171
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 326
44% 328 Pts
64-Core 263
16% 263 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203
Asus(1043 835D) 1GB
CLim: 675 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Lighting 14.5
Reflection 16.8
Parallax 12.9
12% 14.7 fps
MRender 20.5
Gravity 14.6
Splatting 16.8
14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LS 120GB-$98
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM06.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 89 151 63 128 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 452
Write 187
Mixed 199
SusWrite 95.2
51% 233 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 18.5
75% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 68.8
76% 127 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
44GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 162 162 153 163 164 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 134
Write 99.3
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 161
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
2TB free
Firmware: CC9F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 41 106 148 148 147 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 138
Write 108
Mixed 73.9
SusWrite 98.9
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 114%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$58
931GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 135 135 137 138 138 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 146
Write 133
Mixed 86.3
SusWrite 136
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 81%
Great: 76%
External USB3.0 DISK04 129,986.5TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 12 15 10 8.5 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
4.81% Terrible
Read 12.2
Write 44.1
Mixed 22.4
SusWrite 10.9
33% 22.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
11% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.81%
Great: 73%
External USB3.0 DISK02 129,986.5TB
689GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 38 39 39 34 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 76
Write 84.7
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 33.7
86% 64.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
37% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 74%
External USB3.0 DISK03 129,986.5TB
23GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 52 39 39 61 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 67
Write 80.4
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 69.5
99% 71.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
47% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 84%
External USB3.0 DISK01 129,986.5TB
118GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 38 39 39 34 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 59.6
Write 71.6
Mixed 55.1
SusWrite 33.8
74% 55 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
49% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 100%
External USB3.0 DISK00 129,986.5TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 39 40 38 28 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Read 55
Write 101
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 34.6
92% 65.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
93% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600EL Series 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
50.7% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.4
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 14.5
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V PRO Builds (Compare 1,467 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V PRO - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $989
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback