Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

IBM System x3650 -[797971U]-

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	5.53% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	IBM System x3650 -[797971U]- (all builds)
Motherboard	IBM System Planar
Memory	9 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110211
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 21 '20 at 17:22
Run Duration	185 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5335 CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	38.6% Below average	Memory 60.9 1-Core 23.1 2-Core 45.7 31% 43.2 Pts	4-Core 90.4 8-Core 182 16% 136 Pts	64-Core 181 11% 181 Pts

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 84F5) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	5.53% Terrible	Lighting 6.87 Reflection 7.04 Parallax 8 6% 7.3 fps	MRender 4.95 Gravity 7.3 Splatting 7.17 5% 6.48 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.53% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adaptec Array 275GB 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: V1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 87 80 87 80 71 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.4% Average	Read 483 Write 296 Mixed 409 SusWrite 83.8 71% 318 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 21.3 4K Mixed 21.6 73% 21.7 MB/s	DQ Read 22.5 DQ Write 34.3 DQ Mixed 11.2 13% 22.7 MB/s

Adaptec Array 2TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 306GB free Firmware: V1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 70 76 71 71 85 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16.8% Very poor	Read 228 Write 125 Mixed 295 SusWrite 75.6 40% 181 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 9.1 4K Mixed 1.1 8% 3.77 MB/s	DQ Read 1.1 DQ Write 34.4 DQ Mixed 11.6 11% 15.7 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 25%
Adaptec Array 2TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 244GB free Firmware: V1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 77 65 69 64 64 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	31.6% Below average	Read 289 Write 141 Mixed 328 SusWrite 70.2 46% 207 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 21.5 4K Mixed 21.8 43% 15.2 MB/s	DQ Read 5.5 DQ Write 34.6 DQ Mixed 9.6 10% 16.6 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 25%
Adaptec Array 2TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 982GB free Firmware: V1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 85 85 84 83 81 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 56% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12x1GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 12 of 12 slots used 12GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	16.9% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 6 16% 5.67 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 3.7 10% 3.6 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $299	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback