| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 26.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 61.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock 970 Extreme4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130115 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 03 '17 at 02:44 |
| Run Duration | 173 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 25% |
PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
56.2%
Above average
|
54% 85.9 Pts
|
27% 221 Pts
|
19% 304 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 270-$140
CLim: 975 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.4.1
|
26.2%
Poor
|
26% 34.3 fps
|
26% 30.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
61.8%
Good
|
74% 333 MB/s
|
85% 27.6 MB/s
|
22% 39.4 MB/s
|
|
|
53%
Above average
|
50% 69.4 MB/s
|
77% 0.76 MB/s
| |
|
|
39.9%
Below average
|
49% 65.4 MB/s
|
74% 0.73 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
39.1%
Below average
|
39% 13.7 GB/s
|
26% 9.17 GB/s
|
52% 76.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 408 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 127x |
| FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 73x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 59x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 31x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 24x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 21x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $396 |