Average Bench: 55.7% (91st of 115)

Based on 28,461 user benchmarks.  Model: Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 4x4GB

Average average bench

The Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB averaged 44.2% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 20.2GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 20.1GB/s

Above average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB is 32.7%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 14.9GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Mixed IO Bench 16.9GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 28,461 samples)
Min Avg Max
16.2 MC Read 20.1 28.8
14.9 MC Write 20.2 29.5
14.4 MC Mixed 17.7 24.8
55.3% 19.4 GB/s
Min Avg Max
9.4 SC Read 14.9 18.2
8.3 SC Write 17.4 22.6
11.2 SC Mixed 16.9 20.8
46.8% 16.4 GB/s
Min Avg Max
57.2 Latency 71.7 96
55.8% 71.7 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2000 MHz
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 20
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 20.3
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
MC Read 20
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 17.9
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 17.7
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2000 MHz
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 17.1
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 18.6
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 13.5
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 16.5
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
28,461 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,358,449 RAM Kits tested

Typical HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB Builds (Compare 5,676 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $278

Popular HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Excellent

2 years ago.

16GB is plenty for lots of games and can even have multiple chrome tabs open at the same time with minimal performance lost. Not half bad RAM.


Your
opinion?
115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback