Today's hottest deals

Dell PowerEdge T410

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell PowerEdge T410
MotherboardDell PowerEdge T410  (all builds)
Memory17.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180530
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 22 '20 at 15:58
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5607
CPU1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
26.1% Poor
Memory 30
1-Core 30.1
2-Core 66.9
24% 42.3 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 256
22% 188 Pts
64-Core 258
16% 258 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.63% Terrible
Lighting 4.27
Reflection 4.23
Parallax 4.12
4% 4.21 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 6
4% 4.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.63%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 201
Write 201
Mixed 183
44% 195 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 22.7
4K Mixed 15.4
52% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 142
116% 164 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 2TB
307GB free
Firmware: 2.12
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 158
Write 38.2
Mixed 43
59% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
88% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 68%
Seagate IronWolf 2TB (2016)-$73
982GB free
Firmware: SC60
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 14
Write 56.7
Mixed 33
26% 34.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
75% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 100%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 6TB
4TB free
Firmware: 2.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 34 34 34 35 35 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 234
Write 33.7
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 34.3
65% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
92% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 250%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
244GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 113 113 113 113 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 182
Write 154
Mixed 72.9
SusWrite 113
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 114%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 1 4.2 7.4 5.2 4.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 93.2
Write 5.2
Mixed 6
SusWrite 3.8
20% 27 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
15% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M393B5273CH0-YH9 6x4GB
6 of 8 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
22.9% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 8.8
25% 8.87 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 3.6
10% 3.6 GB/s
Latency 255
16% 255 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PowerEdge T410 Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge T410

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback