Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME X570-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive248% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-P  (all builds)
Memory56 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201021
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 26 '20 at 20:36
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Memory 82.4
1-Core 156
2-Core 309
98% 183 Pts
4-Core 562
8-Core 868
88% 715 Pts
64-Core 1,112
69% 1,112 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (143 fps cap detected)
112% Outstanding
Lighting 143
Reflection 143
Parallax 142
116% 143 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 141
Splatting 131
112% 138 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 112%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
241GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 897 648 644 639 634 630 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 2,054
Write 1,647
Mixed 731
SusWrite 682
284% 1,278 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 64.4
236% 90.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,134
DQ Write 1,182
DQ Mixed 832
715% 1,049 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 248%
Great: 254%
Crucial BX200 480GB-$160
43GB free
Firmware: MU02.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 126 79 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 493
Write 412
Mixed 369
SusWrite 144
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 44.8
151% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 178
137% 186 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 95%
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
546GB free
Firmware: RKT401.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3908 3987 3982 3982 3966 963 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
461% Outstanding
Read 2,268
Write 3,667
Mixed 2,289
SusWrite 3,465
664% 2,922 MB/s
4K Read 52.1
4K Write 213
4K Mixed 88.3
305% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,544
DQ Write 1,376
DQ Mixed 1,440
1,085% 1,453 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 461%
Great: 486%
Hitachi HDT725040VLA360 400GB
373GB free
Firmware: V5COA7BA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 64 64 65 64 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 63.4
Write 65
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 63.7
42% 57 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 37%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$46
15GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 92 92 92 91 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 103
Write 99.6
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 90.9
64% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 69%
Seagate Desktop HDD 6TB (2015)-$103
5TB free
Firmware: CC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 201 202 203 203 203 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 210
Write 201
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 200
127% 175 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 117%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
MC Read 39
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 38.2
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 26.2
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 38.1
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X570-P Builds (Compare 8,336 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $744
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback